Journal Entry
Trunking stories and genre splits
From my ‘ask me a question‘ entry, I finally get around to answering the two last questions in the queue:
James asks:
When do you retire (or trunk) a short story? I’m staring at my list of stories, and only a few of them I think are good. Should I trust my own instinct, or maybe I’m not best placed to judge them? Quite a few have been through my crit group, and none have been trashed.
I thought I’ve read you answering this before, but I can’t find the answer.
James, I’ve written over 130 short stories and published just over 30 of them, and about 95 of those are now trunked (and for those following along ‘trunked’ means ‘no longer submitting the short story you’ve written to any markets.’)
So what leads me to keep the surviving 5 out?
Basically there is still something about them that I believe is cool and worthy, but 2-3 of the 5 are starting, at this point, to look like I may retire them. I think realistically I have 2 pro quality stories lying around, but since I’m not entirely sure, I may continue subbing the five.
I use a couple things to figure out when to retire a story. As a writer, each year, you should obviously be growing enough each year that you look back at something you wrote a year ago and see flaws. If you’re not looking back on even earlier writing and seeing how much better you are now, then you are not growing as a writer. You should be able to see how much your earlier efforts suck, but also, you should also be able to spot bits of polish and neatness. So the earlier work is easy for me to spot what’s out of sorts.
If I don’t obviously see why the work sucks so bad it shouldn’t be submitted, the next metric I use is: has a work has exhausted all the markets I submit to? If so, then I retire it.
What’s the last market that something goes to? This can range from writer to writer. I get criticized for saying this, but I believe you should set a lower limit and not submit stories below that. It could be a money limit (nothing less than 3 cents a word, or 1 cent a word). From 1999-2006 I tried to make myself submit only to markets that paid 3 cents a word or more.
Even if I wasn’t sure about a story I still subbed it. Why? Sometimes an editor would spot something cool, and then give rewrite suggestions. I sold 2 stories that I knew had problems that way, because the editors were able to explain to me what I was doing wrong and I worked on fixing it. One of those led to a sale to a nice place!
Because of the worry that I was an apprentice, and because (rumors to the contrary), I’m not that much of a roaring ego-maniac, I tried to submit only to the big magazines and anthologies so that if my stories had issues, they would get professional help. Plus, aiming high seems to often produce high results.
If the story had been to all the markets paying 3 cents a word, then I retired it until another market came up, or the story obviously was full of fail. 95 stories of mine have either gone to all 3 c/w a word markets or I spotted lots of fail. The 5 left I submit to markets as I spot them, but they’re getting close to being retired.
Hope that helps, James!
Larry asks:
Do you believe that there has been a growing tendency among readers to segregate themselves into “genre” camps in recent years? If so, what do you think might be the causes behind this?
Hey it’s web 2.0 world, we love tagging our interests. I think there’s more overlap between the readership than you might think!
Filed under the topic On Writing: Business, On Writing: Craft, On Writing: How I Write on April 9th 2008 at 1:01 pm. You can subscribe to the RSS feed for this entry to keep track of comments. You can also use to trackback.
Comment policy: this is Tobias' blog and space. Like a guest in his house, accord other guests and your host respect and polite discourse while feeling free to engage in debate or comment. Failure to do so results in comment ban or deletion.
Your host:

Tobias is a Caribbean-born SF/F novelist who lives in Ohio.
Contact me:
tobias@tobiasbuckell.com
AIM: tobiasbuckell
Latest Comments
Gigaflop on Why my books are no longer for sale via Amazon (149)
CharlesP on Joshua Bilmes on eBook author royalties (3)
Travis Butler on Teleread offers a more moderated stance (4)
Travis Butler on Why do people want more expensive backlist books? (40)
B. Mac on That (not so much) crumbling core of Western Europe’s military might (134)
Popular this month
In the ER
Repeat
Why my books are no longer for sale via Amazon
Introducing...
That (not so much) crumbling core of Western Europe's military might
Also complicating that is fact that Thalia needs to be home tommorow since she has a cold: cough, runny nose, mild fever. 8 hrs ago
I fell asleep at 7:30pm and woke up at 12:30 due to coughing kid. Awake now. Will be interesting to see when I get tired. 8 hrs ago
Of course, I'm risking cliche. But these are the travails of being an entertainer: in realism vs keep story moving, moving wins 8 hrs ago
Mmm. The extended rise to leader of army plot sequence in this novella will be cut in favor of Duel To Death! Other way is long/boring. :) 8 hrs ago
Thalia's home today sick. Poor kid. Poor Toby's deadline LOL. 19 hrs ago
Currently Reading & Enjoying:

Free Fiction
Novels
Read the first 1/3 free of:
-Crystal Rain: First 1/3 [RTF]
-Ragamuffin-First 1/3 [RTF]
-Sly Mongoose-First 1/3 [RTF]
Short Stories
Toy Planes
The Fish Merchant [pdf]
Her
The Shackles of Freedom (with Mike Resnick)
Necahual
Four Eyes
Aerophilia
Shoah Sry (with Ilsa J. Bick [pdf]
Audio


1. SMD on Apr 9th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Oh, great article, Mr. Buckell. Awesome advice!
2. Tobias Buckell on Apr 9th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
And I should point out, that all the stories were polished and rewritten to the best of my ability at the time! I wasn’t just sending out crap in hopes and editor would wave a wand and fix it. But sometimes you do your very best with what you have, but you know something is still not quite right, those I would send out according to that system above.
Thanks SMD!
3. Steve Thorn on Apr 9th, 2008 at 7:10 pm
‘As a writer, each year, you should obviously be growing enough each year that you look back at something you wrote a year ago and see flaws. If you’re not looking back on even earlier writing and seeing how much better you are now, then you are not growing as a writer.’
I think this piece of advice should be said over and over. It is such a simple piece of common sense, but it is a very important measure of your growth and should not be ignored.
4. Steve Buchheit on Apr 10th, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Yes that is the best advice. I look back on things I’ve written previously and thought they were my best and I wonder just what I was thinking. Couldn’t I see this, that, and the other thing about it? And the answer is, of course not, but I can see it now.
5. SMD on Apr 10th, 2008 at 11:06 pm
You should never send out “crap”. At least, not on purpose. If you think your work is crap, why are you sending it out? You know? (Not saying “you” as in you, just being, what is it, rhetorical?)
I have some stories I’ve retired from way back when I first started taking writing seriously and I have a couple I’m nearing to retiring now. I miss them *sniff*
Okay, that’s going a bit far. Just so you know, I’m linking this article tomorrow or Saturday or at some point this weekend. This is really good advice.