Journal Entry
Microsoft shutting down Encarta, why not release it under Creative Commons?
I remember Encarta. When I purchased my first ever new computer, a $1,600 486 processor-powered Tandy (the last Tandy/Radio Shack branded computer they built, I think), it came with Microsoft Encarta (and Tandy’s horrible user interface bolted on top of Windows 3.1, which I promptly deleted).
Encarta was a handful of disks full of the excitement of the digital encyclopedia. It even had multimedia, I got to click on a picture of a windsurfer and see a postage stamp sized video of a windsurfer jump a large wave.
Cool.
Encarta came with the new computer. Over time, when I got computers Encarta would partially be loaded and Microsoft would bug me to get updates or but it, or whatever, and I’d delete it in favor of going to the library. And then Wikipedia came out and I haven’t thought about Encarta until I read that today Microsoft was discontinuing it.
Makes sense.
But it looks like Microsoft is just shuttering Encarta. I’d encourage them, if they’re just going to drop it, to release the data as creative commons or just plumb gift it to Wikipedia (might even get a tax credit for it).
Encarta has a great deal of multimedia (it’s focus), not just word entries, that would be great additions to wikipedia and to have access to as a resource for teachers and developing worlds. Charts, visual explanations, illustrative photos, all these would be useful to add to common and public knowledge. There is value yet in Encarta.
If the project is dead and Microsoft has no interest in it, it would be a solid gift to let people take Encarta and run with it, or let the useful additions free to beef up wikipedia.
Come on Microsoft, what do you think?
Filed under the topic Journal, Tech on March 31st 2009 at 7:41 am. You can subscribe to the RSS feed for this entry to keep track of comments. You can also use to trackback.
Comment policy: this is Tobias' blog and space. Like a guest in his house, accord other guests and your host respect and polite discourse while feeling free to engage in debate or comment. Failure to do so results in comment ban or deletion.
6 Responses so far
Your host:

Tobias is a Caribbean-born SF/F novelist who lives in Ohio.
Contact me:
tobias@tobiasbuckell.com
AIM: tobiasbuckell
Latest Comments
Suzan H. on Videoblog: How to pick the idea for your first novel (2)
Rachel Heslin on New Apple TV? Roku’s still a good choice (4)
Steve Buchheit on Videoblog: Walking for ideas (3)
T.N. Tobias on Context (1)
Mary Fitzpatrrick on The unbearable loneliness of the solitary artist (6)
Popular this month
In the ER
Repeat
Why my books are no longer for sale via Amazon
Introducing...
That (not so much) crumbling core of Western Europe's military might
Jumpcut, a mac clipboard buffering tool. I've been looking for one of these! http://jumpcut.sourceforge.net/ 3 days ago
Gmail's adding Priority Inbox tomorrow. http://bit.ly/b3f8BY /via @cerebus19 (wow, interesting!) 3 days ago
Liking Drop Box more and more. If you want to give it a try, use this link to give you & me extra 250 megs of storage: http://bit.ly/b9Cs0z 3 days ago
doing freelance copy editing. There's a big diff between verses and versus. Just saying. One is more poetic than the other. 3 days ago
For those suggesting collection titles, it's stories from my bibliography: 2008 and on: http://bit.ly/cQHnSU 3 days ago
Currently Reading & Enjoying:

Free Fiction
Novels
Read the first 1/3 free of:
-Crystal Rain: First 1/3 [RTF]
-Ragamuffin-First 1/3 [RTF]
-Sly Mongoose-First 1/3 [RTF]
Short Stories
Toy Planes
The Fish Merchant [pdf]
Her
The Shackles of Freedom (with Mike Resnick)
Necahual
Four Eyes
Aerophilia
Shoah Sry (with Ilsa J. Bick [pdf]
Audio


1. Steve Buchheit on Mar 31st, 2009 at 9:28 am
I believe the term “corporate culture” would be appropriate here.
2. David D. Levine on Mar 31st, 2009 at 10:59 am
Nice thought, but the odds that the contracts Microsoft signed with all the people who created the multimedia content they used would allow them to gift that content to Wikipedia are extremely slim.
3. Tobias Buckell on Mar 31st, 2009 at 11:29 am
True, but I’ll bet usually MSFT like most larger companies is pretty strong on the rights grab (we get to use this content to do whatever we want with it)… I’ve done corporate writing, trust me, it pays well, and you give up all rights to ownership usually.
4. Fred Kiesche on Mar 31st, 2009 at 2:57 pm
I’m surprised they didn’t just spin it off to “enhance shareholder value”…
5. spyscribbler on Apr 9th, 2009 at 10:09 am
That’s a great idea, Tobias! I wish they would/could!
6. Dr. Phil on Apr 21st, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Word 95 Professional came with Bookshelf ‘95 — a small program loaded with the American Heritage 3rd Edition dictionary, the Concise Columbian Encyclopedia, Hammond Atlas, etc. These were mostly the works I had in hardcopy next to my computer anyway. The revised Bookshelf ‘98 product included some of the new Microsoft Encarta sources.
I still use Word 95 today and I use Bookshelf ‘95/98 nearly everyday, even though it’s not so useful with modern stuff. One advantage is that when I get down to writing, I usually work on machines without Internet access. (grin)
The problem with liking any product, Microsoft included, is that ten years after you’ve made it indispensable to your work, the companies dispose of it.
Your Creative Commons approach sure would be a nice thing.
Dr. Phil