Journal Entry
Media Consumption: The Descent (2005)
May 17th 2008 at 4:56 am
While doing some administrivia I started up the Brit horror movie The Descent. Plugged in my headphones and let it run in my office, thinking it would be descent grade B+ horror I could listen in on and multitask with. I was quite surprised to find myself enjoying it quite a bit, so I full screened and let it rip.
Some single sentence impressions to pitch the movie:
1) Modern day adventurers descend into a caving system, find modern day gollums, but horror styled (and who don’t get all Serkis on you) ones who eat you. Shenanigans ensue.
2) Deliverance, but with gollums in caves who eat you instead of weird rednecks. Either way, if there’s one thing we’ve learned from Hollywood, it’s be scared of vacationing in the South (Deathproof, Descent, Deliverance, etc).
3) Actress Natalie Mendoza gets covered in blood and kicks gollum ass with climbing pitons (in all honesty, if I dig deep, probably the shallow reason I Netflixed the movie).
So some spoilers.
Mendoza’s character (Juno), as is hinted very strongly in the first ten minutes, was having an affair with MacDonald’s (Sarah) character’s husband, who then dies in a horrible accident (along with their daughter). Juno isn’t much help with a grieving Sarah, so this caving expedition (to a new cave no one has mapped out) with a large group of friends, is sort of her way of trying to set things right. She seems to be someone who struggles to face how to handle these things, and chooses action and activity (is the first one up in the morning to run, constantly full of energy) as if she keeps moving emotional things won’t catch up. It’s her decision to mislead the group into the caves, where she explains it was her idea to find something new that they could name. She pitches it as something she’s doing for Sarah, but angry, they point out she’s a bit egotistical, and it could well be that she wants some glory.
So they get trapped in the cave system thanks to a plot-convenient cave-in and these gollum things start attacking them. They all scatter in panic, and Juno gets all ass-kickery on the damn things, using a climbing piton to good effect. Her physical-based character and reactions are again defining the character.
Then her damn friend Beth comes running up behind her at the tail end of the melee. Having been jumped out of the dark by X number of gollums, Juno spins and thrusts, sadly, spiking Beth through the throat.
You know what, that’s understandable. If a bunch of pasty, big-eared, flesh-eating gollum type things jumped my ass, and I’d had to fight for my life with a climbing spike, and someone tapped me on the shoulder at the end of that, I’d frigging spike them the throat too.
I mean, who the hell is going to walk up to someone who’s just split the skull of a freaky creature of the dark and spook them? I mean, it’s bad enough when you do it in real life when someone’s just trying to get something out of the fridge and they jump up in the air like a startled cat. What do you think’s going to happen when you bust out of a shadow in this situation? Yeah, that’s right, your ass is going to get run through the throat. I guaran-frigging-tee it.
Juno’s pretty freaked out, Beth gargles a lot and drops, but not before stealing her necklace. Juno takes off. Everyone runs around a lot, and one by one they’re all picked off, as happens in movies like this. I jumped a few times, some good little scares.
Sarah, meanwhile, goes from post-traumatic former soccer mom type to blood covered gollum-killer, using bones as weapons (she’s ready to take on the apes from 2001, but she screams louder). But in her meanderings, she stumbles across poor blood gargling Beth, who tells her Juno spiked her, and by the way, Juno’s necklace is obviously a gift from her dead husband. They must have boinking each other.
So Sarah’s having an all-around bad day.
Eventually, it’s just Sarah and Juno together. Juno hasn’t exactly been forthcoming with the fact that she accidentally killed a good friend of theirs, she tells Sarah a sort of ‘Beth died… you know… back there.’ They both face a long journey ahead of them to try and find the surface, with many more gollums along the way. So Sarah piths Juno in the leg and heads off down a tunnel.
Now, to be fair to Sarah, she just found out that Juno was screwing her husband, so this is sort of a crime of passion. But on the other hand, Sarah keeps hallucinating seeing her dead kid, she’s screaming like a pyscho all the time, and something tells me she’s not quite level in the head. Why? Because Sarah doesn’t escape, she slides down the end of the tunnel, and in the end, is seen sitting on a ledge near a small fire imagining she can see her dead kid as the gollums scream and, presumably, draw nearer.
Although the movie was a fun ride, I kind felt left with a weird taste.
For one thing, do horror movies hate women? They all die. The ostensible heroine just ends up batshit crazy at the end, killing a potential ally against the gollums and then not even seeking a way out.
A couple days ago I saw another horror movie where a woman is chased and scared through a whole movie, and then ends up captured at the very end. Usually the motif is that the woman runs scared all through the movie, until the very, very last moment, where she either comes up with a bit of a trick/subterfuge to kill the bad guy, or finds herself a capable man. I remember watching the last one, where the bad guy is getting ready to run the woman over while she’s sitting next to a copy who has a gun. Said chick never goes for the gun until fifteen minutes later, when the cop friggin’ tells her too (and she protests, oh no, I can’t do that, I can’t shoot the gun. So help me, anyone dumb enough to say that just needs run over quick anyway, there’s just no survival sense. Most woman I know would have grabbed the gun within seconds ‘how do I use this frigging thing, dying cop, and tell my quickly.’). Plus, the bad guy is always male.
As a result, the fact that both strong women in Descent dies (and as a result of bad feelings over a man, see, the long arm of the patriarchy extends even to the dark depths of a cave), sort of disappointed me. I mean, come on, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs?
Sarah could have waited until they got to safety and then stabbed Juno’s leg and shoved her back down the pit. That would have been good.
And then there’s the other obvious element, Juno being the antagonist, a bit of a stretch, okay, fair enough, but she’s also the only non lily-white chick in the group.
So, okay, it’s still enjoyable for what it is. Some will complain about the above paragraph, or the sort of freshman level feminist critique, because they’ll say I’m taking the fun out of the movie by being over sensitive. I’m not a sensitive dude, it usually takes a bat or lots of repetition for me to notice this stuff. And I’m not condemning the movie at all. The movie is still well written. If so many horror movies I saw didn’t struggle with women not being strong enough to defend themselves, and if minorities in general were cast or played with as heros more often, then this movie would not suffer from that repeated circumstance.
It’s like the magical negro. There’s nothing wrong with The Legend of Baggar Vance, The Stand, or the Green Mile, when each minority character is a guide of wisdom to the white characters. But when you keep seeing that over and over again it lessens those movies somewhat, because it’s a cheap template. And likewise, Descent reuses the same template and doesn’t rise above it.
Still a well written movie, but so well written that I started to expect a bit more. By itself, a great movie. Viewed against others, I had that taste in my mouth I mentioned earlier.
How do you beat something like that?
Well, one simple way is in the movie Death Proof, by Quentin Tarantino. I have a nascent sort of critique of it, which is that Death Trap, in one small way, can be argued to be a feminist critique of the traditional horror chick chase movie.
Before I embarrass myself with this theory, I’ll state that I know I risk sounding like Jane on the TV series coupling when she walks into Jeff’s apartment and sees a poster of ‘Attack of the 50 Foot Woman’ and says “oh, you like feminist cinema! I do too!”
So here we go. In Death Trap, for the first 1/2 of the film, maybe slightly less, a group of woman cavorts, hangs out, and chills. Because the movie has spent so long building up their characters people expect that maybe these characters will be the ones that go on through to the end… oh, no, Stuntman Mike, the bad guy, runs into their car with his ‘Death Proof’ stunt car and kills them all.
The movie sort of resets: again, a group of gals gets together for some fun in Tennessee, they go to test drive a car, and Stuntman Mike shows up in a new DeathProofed car and starts ramming them (overlay some Freudian fun here. In fact, I really wish this film had been out in college when I was doing critical theory).
Now, in classic horror movie template, these woman would be victimized by Stuntman Mike until the last few minutes, where by some trick, last minute act of desperation, or by finding a man, they, or at least one of them, would survive.
But no, after one initial round of getting rammed by this crazy psycho and forced off the road, Kim (played by Tracie Thomas) pulls a gun on Stuntman Mike and f*&king shoots him.
At this point, the departure from a traditional horror flick becomes quite interesting. Stuntman Mike screams like a little girl, shocked that his victims are fighting back. He takes off in his car.
The women confer with each other and decided to hunt him down, grabbing a large piece of pipe and taking off after him. Mike, who’s pulled over and is freaking out, has lost all power, authority, and control of the situation. The male-power fantasy and domination of these woman has been stripped away, revealing a sad person, not a menacing faceless evil.
They ram his car and bash him with the pipe, and then he’s the one on the run as they start bashing his car (with Kim shouting ‘take it up the ass motherf&*ker’ with each bash, for more Freudian filtering fun). The woman have flipped it over, are in complete control, and they catch up to this guy, pull him from his car, and bootstomp his face into the pavement.
Okay, it’s not feminist cinema, Tarantino has stocked the film with beautiful women in tight clothes, and lets the camera do the male point of view thing all throughout. However, he’s subverted some of the unthinking layers in an interesting way when the women regain power in a dramatic way.
Tarantino also mixes up ethnicities. He has (gasp) two black women. Jungle Julia dies in the first crash, in the second, Kim is the one with the piece that shoots back. Rosario Dawson is Latina. Zoe Belle is Aussie. By having a range of people, Tarantino doesn’t have to act like he’s on eggshells, because viewers aren’t as likely to interpret the actions of any single minority as a stand in for all. If you have some variation you can get on with multiple characterizations and not stumble into as many pits.
Had the Descent included a bit more of that sort of subversion, I think it may have transcended my B+ rating and into something higher.
All in all, though, still not a bad 2 hours.
Filed in Movies. You can subscribe to the RSS feed for this entry to keep track of comments. You can also use to trackback.
Your host:
Tobias is a Caribbean-born SF/F novelist who lives in Ohio.
Contact me:
tobias@tobiasbuckell.com
AIM: tobiasbuckell
Latest Comments
Steven Klotz on My story Placa del Fuego is now available to read at Clarkesworld (4)
Wyman Cooke on I used to think I knew… (7)
Scott Marlowe on The Sword-Edged Blonde (4)
Wyman Cooke on Jim Hines is taunting the internets (8)
Jason on Questions week (14)
Top Commenters
JGS (1)
Matt Ruff (1)
Aimee P (1)
Steve Buchheit (1)
Joshua Bilmes (1)
Currently Reading & Enjoying:
Most Commented
In the ER (338)
Repeat (170)
Introducing... (139)
Caption contest: Pat Rothfuss in cat ears (129)
Diversity in science fiction markets (82)
Uncool, man. Just uncool. (78)
Asimov's forum ickiness (76)
What does it mean to be this Caribbean writer? (74)
Thursday update (64)
Science Fiction anti-Christian? (63)















1. Matt Ruff on May 17th, 2008 at 10:11 am
For one thing, do horror movies hate women? They all die.
There’s actually a large horror subgenre in which all of the protagonists are doomed. In the most “upbeat” variant of this, one or two characters are left breathing at the end of the last reel, but it’s clear from the fadeout that the monster/psycho killer is still alive too, so death has only been deferred, sometimes by mere minutes. In the most depressing variant — especially common in Asian horror — even the possibility of survival is off the table. You know everyone’s going to die, it’s just a question of who’s going first and how much they’ll suffer on the way out. When the brunt of the suffering is borne by female characters, it’s perfectly reasonable to ask, “Is this misogyny?” but even where the answer is clearly “Yes,” I’m not sure misogyny is necessarily the point.
That said, I was disappointed by The Descent for pretty much the same reasons you were: Juno killing Beth was tragic but didn’t seem like the sort of thing she needed to lie about — when you’re fighting flesh-eating cave-dwellers, accidents happen. And Sarah stabbing Juno felt wrong. Even leaving aside the issue of the timing, the set-up seemed to imply Juno was getting what she deserved, and emotionally, I didn’t agree — which made Sarah into a vindictive sadist.
2. Aimee P on May 17th, 2008 at 11:04 am
Females in horror movies tend to be what I call “weak sisters”. If they don’t die, they might pull themselves together and fight their attackers. It’s usually after a major freak out that involves a lot of hysterical crying and tripping over invisible objects, though. Basically, anything they can do to show themselves weak and useless.
In The Descent, the female characters freaked out, yes, but they freaked out in ways that made it seem like they wanted to survive. They were not weak. I loved that Juno and Sarah fought toe to toe with their attackers. I also loved that even the weakest of the group, after having her throat slit by one of the monsters, stabbed the gollum in the chest before she bled out.
I also didn’t look at Sarah stabbing Juno as being over a man. Sarah had lost everything that was important to her except her friendships with Beth and Juno, and the memory of her loving husband and daughter. Then she finds out that not only did Juno kill Beth, but she also had and affair with Sarah’s husband–which betrays their friendship AND tarnishes the memory of her husband. In my opinion, Sarah wanted two things at the end of the movie: retribution and death.
I disagree that we are supposed to think Juno is getting what she deserves. In my opinion, we see that Sarah and Juno think that Juno is getting what she deserves. We are supposed to recognize that both Juno’s guilt and Sarah’s retribution lead to their destruction. (Which Sarah is okay with, but she’s demonstrably unstable anyway.)
Can you tell I loved this movie?
3. Steve Buchheit on May 17th, 2008 at 5:08 pm
I think that’s difference between Dark Fantasy and Horror. In Dark Fantasy, there is always hope the characters will survive, in Horror the Grue is gonna eat you, no matter what. As for the misogyny, I don’t think it’s just for horror movies. Heck, even in that egalitarian universe of Star Trek NG, the strong women characters usually die (and I think the only love interest of Worf to survive was Diana Troy) or have to be saved by the strong male character.
4. Tobias Buckell on May 17th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
Matt, to repeat a comment in my LJ:
I agree about there being movies where everyone dies, I have enjoyed many movies like Dawn of the Dead or Open Water where the characters are all doomed, but never did I finish the movie feeling as conflicted about the direction as with Descent. There felt like there were more cues in those movies that let you know to expect this. The nature of the cues in Descent strongly hint at someone surviving, or at the very least, when the characters all go down fighting, there is more satisfaction, the main character in Descent giving up to a hallucination and waiting to die at the end of the Descent left me feeling annoyed. Seeing everyone die in other movies, or even heros die in other movies, doesn’t leave me as conflicted.
Now as Aimee points out, one can see Sarah as a morally problematic person who deserved to die after killing Juno off, their actions each doom them in an odd kind of way.
I can see that interpretation, and I understand. It just didn’t work for me.
5. Joshua Bilmes on May 19th, 2008 at 12:07 am
I saw this in Glasgow when I went over for WorldCon two years ago, with somewhat high expectations because the UK critics had been going pretty gaga over what a mature fresh horror movie it was. I left disappointed, though for reasons similar but not identical to those expressed here. Yeah, the start of the movie with the female bonding was kind of fresh and fun, but when you got right down to it, it was also just another monster movie with monsters that don’t make any sense with all the usual monster movie type scares and the metronome ticking to give the proper mix of scares and light moments, just like it’s done in Jaws.
6. JGS on May 19th, 2008 at 12:40 pm
My wife and I saw The Descent in the theater and loved it. First and foremost because we’re horror movie fans, and it’s a damn good horror movie - the best I’ve seen in a while. I don’t know that it re-invents the genre or anything, but I don’t think it’s a stretch to call it mature and fresh - it’s certainly miles better then anything else I’ve seen in the genre recently.
I thought the scares were well-done and not predictable - I mean, in a monster/horror movie you know the scares are coming, otherwise it wouldn’t be a monster/horror movie. But I liked The Descent because it added a twist to a lot of the scares (e.g. the video camera view of the monsters) that I hadn’t seen before, or that didn’t fall on the predictable ‘beat’.
Of course, ’scary’ is one of those intrinsically personal things - what’s scary to some people is laughable to others. I was sweating bullets just from them crawling around in a cave, so the setting for the movie was very effective for me.
For one thing, do horror movies hate women? They all die.
Short answer, yes.
Although I should point out there are two endings to - when we saw it in the theater, Sarah drives off at the end…
While I can see your point here, I respectfully disagree. I thought the director made a grim, pessimistic horror film with a collection of morally complicated ‘real’ characters, who happened to be women, and who behaved like most real, rational people would behave if they were dumped into that kind of horrific situation. No, they weren’t Ash with his chainsaw and shotgun, but it wasn’t that kind of movie. I don’t think it’s fair to rap The Descent for a (in my view) realistic portrayal of the characters just because so many other horror movies treat women as weak victims.
In fact, I’ll go farther and say I think Death Proof is actually less ‘feminist’ then The Descent, even though the women ‘win’ - because it’s women are cartoon sex-bomb superheros, right down to the lap-dancing. Sure, that’s a more positive stereotype then hysterical victim of many horror flicks, but it’s still a stereotype. The women in The Descent, by contrast, are real people who behave in a realistic manner.
And now I’ll bolster my questionable feminist credentials by dragging my wife into this… she loved The Descent for the same reason - the female ‘team’ dynamic felt right on to her (as someone who’s played a lot of team sports). These were, finally, some female horror-film protagonists she could relate to.
That’s my take anyway - I do take your point that template characters, even if they’re a ‘positive’ template, reduce their subjects to a, well, a template. But IMO The Descent doesn’t do that. Death Proof does.
A few other quibbles:
I think Juno lying about killing Beth was a realistic reaction. Sure she didn’t ‘need’ to, given the circumstances, but really how do you think someone is going to react to something that horrific? Do you think there’d be no guilt just because it was an understandable accident?
If having an Aussie counts as ‘mixing ethnicities’, does having a mix of English and Americans not? (Yes, I’m splitting hairs, yes, I know your larger point is that Tarantino has persons of color in the ‘hero’ roles, yes I agree.)
And Death Proof as a feminist critique? I see as more of an homage to 60’s ‘bad girl’ movies like Faster Pussycat - that’s certainly where he got the structure and the overall vibe. I guess you can argue that those films are a subversion of the usual stereotypes, but it seems to me they just replace them with another stereotype.
Whew, that was quite a rant. My $.02, offered in the spirit of friendly discussion.