Journal Entry
Rewriting
Justine Larbalestier says all sorts of really intelligent things about rewriting on her blog:
There are two basic kinds of rewriting: structural and sentence level. Most beginner writers get caught up in sentence level changes. They go over their manuscripts deleting and switching words around (what’s called line editing in the biz). They do this before they’ve learned how to fix the structure. The result is lots of shifting around of deck chairs while the Titanic sinks.
Structural rewrites are the kind that change the genre of your story (this would be so much better with a vampire), the order of events (wouldn’t it make more sense if the quokkas were stolen in the first chapter?), the relationships of the characters (if they were brother and sister it would be way more intense), the setting (have you actually been to Sydney?—I’m not buying the ease with which your character walked from Surry Hills to Dural), what point of view it’s in (you know Hans is kind of boring but Greta rocks—why don’t you have her tell the story?), whether it’s told in past or present tense (if the narrator is telling the tale from beyond the grave putting it in present tense makes no sense), and so forth.
Trying to get new writers out of thinking of sentence level tweaking as ‘rewriting’ and into structure is really tough. You change a sentence, spot a typo, it feels like *work accomplished*. But moving chapters around, or changing characters, that feels like *more work* and is often hard to quantify whether you made it better or not.
Filed under the topic On Writing: Craft on January 3rd 2008 at 4:19 pm. You can subscribe to the RSS feed for this entry to keep track of comments. You can also use to trackback.
Comment policy: this is Tobias' blog and space. Like a guest in his house, accord other guests and your host respect and polite discourse while feeling free to engage in debate or comment. Failure to do so results in comment ban or deletion.
4 Responses so far
Your host:

Tobias is a Caribbean-born SF/F novelist who lives in Ohio.
Contact me:
tobias@tobiasbuckell.com
AIM: tobiasbuckell
Latest Comments
Glen Murie on Truly ‘Off the Grid’? (4)
Professor Beej on To achieve more: daydream more (12)
Alex J. Kane on Framing kids’ deviance by race (5)
Derek on CO2 filtering ‘necklace’ (3)
Steve Buchheit on Living in the Antarctic (2)
Popular this month
In the ER
Repeat
Why my books are no longer for sale via Amazon
Introducing...
That (not so much) crumbling core of Western Europe's military might
Took @writerswife to see Inception. Her first time seeing it, my second. Still awesome. She liked it as well. 5 hrs ago
This is great, I haven't had an audience this appreciative of a burp since living in a guys dorm in college: http://tweetphoto.com/35975438 12 hrs ago
Breakfast with the twins. They're excited, I'm not usually up this early... http://tweetphoto.com/35974832 12 hrs ago
What the crap. Went to bed at half past midnight, woke up at 6:15am with racing brain. What up with that? 14 hrs ago
I should be upset my kids are ripping up some books from my shelf a bit: I just like that they're interested in them 1 day ago
Currently Reading & Enjoying:

Free Fiction
Novels
Read the first 1/3 free of:
-Crystal Rain: First 1/3 [RTF]
-Ragamuffin-First 1/3 [RTF]
-Sly Mongoose-First 1/3 [RTF]
Short Stories
Toy Planes
The Fish Merchant [pdf]
Her
The Shackles of Freedom (with Mike Resnick)
Necahual
Four Eyes
Aerophilia
Shoah Sry (with Ilsa J. Bick [pdf]
Audio


1. Patrick on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 5:01 pm
The thing is, many new writers and critiquers feel there MUST be structural changes after the first draft, but a writer is often the worst judge of their own work. How often have you heard a writer say they hate their most popular piece and love the thing that they couldn’t sell?
2. Steve Buchheit on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
I remember the first time I looked at a proto-story I had completed and thought, “Hey, if I took scissors and cut each of the paragraphs apart to re-arrange them this way, this could be so much stronger…” The clouds opened, angelic choirs sang, and little animals started sewing me a new vest while singing a jaunty tune. It was magical. Much more than the “this section drags the rest of the story down, I should just dump it” epiphany.
3. Matt Jarpe on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 6:16 pm
It’s also difficult to find test readers who are willing to talk structure. Whenever I give a new ms out to test readers I accompany it with a long intro that this is a first draft, I want to know if it works, what works, what doesn’t, what to keep, what to lose, etc. Often I get back a lot of line editing.
My agent, on the other hand, gets back to me with “this lacks structure and complexity.” Whoa. Now that’s a roll up your sleeves moment. Let’s tear this mother to the studs and remodel to suit!
4. bob charters on Jan 3rd, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Tweaking a sentence, I thought, was called ‘editing’, not ‘rewriting’.
Plenty of that is usually needed too — especially in mine — but I certainly see the point for rewriting. I once caught myself stuffing eight days worth of events into a seven day week.