<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pickled Dragon</title>
	<link>http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2004/01/30/pickled-dragon/</link>
	<description>online and causing trouble since 1998</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2004/01/30/pickled-dragon/#comment-639</link>
		<author>Rachel</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2004/01/30/pickled-dragon/#comment-639</guid>
					<description>Yeah, it's probably a fake -- but wouldn't it be &lt;em&gt;cool&lt;/em&gt; if the autopsy report came back saying it was real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s probably a fake &#8212; but wouldn&#8217;t it be <em>cool</em> if the autopsy report came back saying it was real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Janssens</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2004/01/30/pickled-dragon/#comment-640</link>
		<author>Scott Janssens</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2004/01/30/pickled-dragon/#comment-640</guid>
					<description>Wouldn't an umbilical cord mean it was a mammal?  AFAIK, it would be the only mammal with wings (true wings, not like a bat or flying squirrel).  You'd think the German scientists would be better at faking a species.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t an umbilical cord mean it was a mammal?  AFAIK, it would be the only mammal with wings (true wings, not like a bat or flying squirrel).  You&#8217;d think the German scientists would be better at faking a species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
